|
Page
Update:
8/31/05
Verdict Issued !
March 31, 2005
Justice Denied
By US-
Get the Full Story:

Case Related Links:
            

Hot Links:




   

 

UPDATE:
September 19, 2005
Afghan TOLO TV calls for resignation of Chief Judge Shinwari and
arrest of Taliban Judge Abdul Bakhtyari for keeping innocent men
in jail and taking bribes. TOLO TV Special Report airs
FIVE days in a row. Other judges allege law-breaking,
bribe taking, and murder threats by Afghan judges.


Khawar vs. Globe International, Inc,
10 CAL 4th 254 (1998) cert. denied, 526 U.S. 114 (1999)
Note:
"U.S." as in;
United States Supreme Court
Note 2:
Pizzulli also won an injunction from the court, and had 50,000 books
delivered to Khawar's Farm, where they held a bonfire picnic and burned all
50,000 books.
|

Recent News:
TORTURE
CHARGE DISMISSED
FOR ACTUAL INNOCENCE
February 27, 2005
Kabul, Afghanistan
In a closed secret appeals court
hearing in the new trial ordered in December 2004, a six judge panel,
twice the judges normally sitting on the court, including two senior
religious judges has found ALL of the SuperPatriots INNOCENT of all
torture charges after a covertly obtained video of Taliban Judge Mawlawi
Sidiq was played in court.
According
to sources, and confirmed by Jack, Judge Sidiq stated during the
surreptitiously recorded tape that he "was never tortured, hung upside
down, doused with water, or even slapped." In fact, the Taliban
Karzai appointee admitted that his ONLY complaint was that the
SuperPatriots did not allow him to use the bathroom for more than twelve
hours and this violated Islamic Law. The court also privately
viewed pictures of Sidiq meeting with one of the world's top terrorists,
Gulbideen Hekmatyar, along with one of Sidiq's brothers, Malikyar, the
original terrorist Task Force Saber/7 was hunting.

Hekmatyar is best remembered for his
bloody siege on Kabul and killing more than 20,000 civilians, women, and
children with Russian Katucha rockets and tank shells. According
to Peter Bergen, one of the world's foremost authorities on terrorists,
and author of HOLY WAR, INC based on his meeting with Osama bin Laden,
Hekmatyar is an "ultra-Islamic Taliban" who once "slaughtered 36 men
under the Command of Ahmad Shah Massoud... in July 1989," and later
killed "thousands of civilians in Kabul..." from 1992 onward
(quoted from page 76, Holy War, Inc., cover
photo courtesy of Peter Bergen).

According to the SuperPatriots, and a
US Embassy Official, the court was more than shocked by the pictures of
Mawlawi Sidiq meeting with Hekmatyar long after he was placed on the
Most Wanted Terrorist List. They were also moved by a PowerPoint
show on Jack's exploits in Afghanistan for the past three years, and
pictures proving Jack had personally worked with President Karzai and
both Vice-Presidents on anti-terror operations.
That means that three charges have now
been dismissed; Illegally Entering the Country, Operating a Private
Jail, and Torture.
Hearings are still in progress and
expected to continue for one more month.

UNITED
NATIONS ISSUES
SCATHING INDICTMENT AGAINST
TALIBAN JUDGE IN SUPERPATRIOTS CASE
February 11, 2005
Kabul, Afghanistan
On February 11, 2005, M. Cherif
BASSIOUNI, the Independent Expert of the Commission on Human Rights On
the Situation of Human Rights in Afghanistan, issued an initial United
Nations report on the Afghan court and justice system.
Drafted for the UN's Office of
the High Commissioner for Human Rights, the report was called a scathing
indictment by the Afghan news services. However, it is not new
news, or unexpected news. Everyone knows the Afghan justice system
is simply broken. Run by judges with no formal education in law,
and administered by people without a high school education, former
Taliban officials and al-Qaida linked terrorists, have made their way
back into Karzai's government in a variety of areas, most importantly
the legal arena. As a result, terrorists are going free every day
to kill again. In the past 12 months more than 900 al-Qaida and
Taliban fighters captured in 2001 and 2002 who's defeat was paid for
with the blood of American Special Forces and Special Operations troops,
have been released by former Taliban Karzai officials. This is old
news.
What
is new, is the United Nation's blistering attack on one specific judge,
Abdul Baset Bakhtyari. In fact, the report was so damning that
Bakhtyari, who relishes publicity, called a Press Conference in Kabul to
denounce the United Nations' report. The "former" Taliban Judge
has been specifically accused of ignoring the law, taking bribes from
terrorists, and running the National Security Court as though it was
still the era of the Taliban.
The
UN Report also slammed the NDS (National Security Court) for directly
engaging in and authorizing torture, refusing to allow access to
prisoners by the UN, and running a house of horrors. Interestingly
enough, NDS is run by an American citizen, who holds secret dual
citizenship, and is funded by the American FBI, NOT the CIA.
Through this secret court and the secret SADERAT interrogation facility,
the FBI is able to "render" subjects. Rendering is the removal of
a suspect from US custody to foreign custody where they can be tortured
by proxies of an American agency. While the CIA and Special Forces
recently have been accused of this, the evidence shows that
"rendering" has only been done to high-level foreign al-Qaida threats
deemed to be an immediate and serious threat to US security interests
and with immediate potential to inflict casualties on US citizens
through imminent acts of terror. On the other hand, the FBI has
engaged in rendering, through the Afghan NDS, and with the assistance of
US Citizen Hamid Karzai (he did not give up his US Citizenship when he
assumed the elected presidency, and secretly remains a US citizen with a
special waiver from the US State Department).
The FBI's use of rendering to interrogate suspects,
especially low-level soldiers, may be one of the future targets of the
UN special commission.
Mr. Bassiouni, and a large entourage of attorneys and
investigators met with Jack and the other task Force Saber/7 members
just ten days before the special initial report was issued. Lt.
Banderas asked only one question during the lengthy meeting but it got
everyone's attention in the room, and brought virtual silence.
"Excuse me sir, may I ask, how is it that I fought
the Taliban and terrorists my entire adult life, and followed the way of
Commander Massoud, only to be tortured and sent to prison by a Taliban
Judge? How is that sir, can you please explain that to me?"
Mr. Bassiouni did not have an immediate answer, but
Jack did:
"Zorro, that's why Mr. Bassiouni is here today, that's why
he is here..."

John
Edwards Tiffany,
Esquire,
is
a powerhouse attorney from Bloomfield, NJ that specializes in federal criminal
defense cases. He has represented international criminal and civil
clients of notoriety in the US, Haiti, Africa, and other countries.
His father is a former US Marine. He is very much involved in
cases involving National Security interests. A native New Yorker,
he lost friends in on 9/11, and Tiffany's strength is his tenacity and resilience.

Where others might cringe at the thought of
taking on a US Ambassador or the FBI, Tiffany relishes the idea.
Tiffany has made it clear to just about everyone, that he believes in the complete innocence of
Jack and his men. John Tiffany's most important attribute may be the most
dangerous thing opponents have to fear– loyalty.
Francis C.
Pizzulli, Esquire, is a longtime attorney of Jacks. He
specializes in civil litigation, copyright claims, and liable. He
is the lawyer that won the famous Khawar v. GLOBE International case based on a
reporter
falsely identifying a man as the real killer of Robert F. Kennedy.
Pizzulli successfully took the case to the California Supreme Court and
won a verdict against the Globe for republishing erroneous information
they failed to adequately, and independently investigate.
That case
laid the groundwork for every case since based on a reporter reprinting
an incorrect statement based on another article or story. Sounds
like Mr. Pizzulli will be one of the lead attorneys in Jack's cases
against Flogging the Simian, New York Magazine, Columbia Journalism
Review, Donald Trump, and a few others.
Hamid
Karzai, et al:
The Case Against Them
Karzai
has personal involvement in the case, and complicity in the illegal acts
against the SuperPatriots. Karzai knew Jack from the 2001/2002 war and had
personally authorized Jack to conduct a variety of operations during
that time. One of the most visible was Jack's participation in
Nahrin Rescue Operation in March/April 2002, when Karzai provided him
with a government helicopter.
Amrullah
Saleh also has personal involvement in the case. Saleh was an
interpreter for an NGO in Pakistan when the war broke out in 2001. When the war wound down, Saleh, found himself with
lots of contacts, dual citizenship (he had lived in the US), and
political ambition. In 2003, the FBI, hot to break into the Afghan
counter-terrorist ops club, started setting up shop in Kabul by throwing
around lots of money. They aligned with Amrullah, used their State
Department contacts to get Engineer Araf (a Massoud man and high-ranking
member of the Northern Alliance) fired. Karzai, with the help of
the FBI, now had control of the country's intelligence service, and that
meant he could decrease Panshir power and protect his Pashtun "former"
Taliban appointees. Saleh is alleged, and significant
evidence exists to support it, to have personally beaten Jack and Lt.
Banderas to unconsciousness while handcuffed, in his office, while FBI
agents stood in the hallway laughing.
Judge
Bakhtyari not only sanctioned and authorized extensive torture of the
men, but fully refused to follow the law. He is already
under fire for more than 100 violations of the 26 most important
articles of the Afghan Criminal Code.
NOT ONCE were the accused able to examine any court or
evidence file. The files were waved in the air at the accused, shown to
the press, shown to alleged victims, and were repeatedly promised
to the accused. But still, after fifteen court appearances in
eight months,
the files have never been seen by the accused.
However, the NDS
files have been sold to the press by the Primary Court
Prosecutor, Saranwal Nahim Dawari. Furthermore, the
NDS files were given to reporters by Dawari to review overnight and therefore the
chain of evidence was violated and broken. The files are no longer
inviolate, and therefore are tainted evidence. Add this into
Dawari's brutal interrogations of witnesses, destruction of exculpatory
evidence, and links to the Taliban, and you have a solid case for abuse
of process and the concealment of terrorist acts.
Sherzai,
one of Jack's house staff, testified twice under oath during the
new Appeals Court trial, that he was beaten, that he is illiterate, that
he refused to sign a statement against Jack, and that he was then given
Valium, rendered semi-conscious and his thumbprint forcibly placed on a
statement he never read or made. Fatah is alleged to have
authorized this, along with the extended torture of the other men, and
electrocution of Northern Alliance Commando Major Ezmerai Amin. In
recent months, Fatah has tried to coerce Northern Alliance officials to
withdraw protection of Jack in Pulacharke Prison and to "apply
additional pressure on top of them." Basically, in Afghan talk,
that means reinstitute torture in order to obtain confessions now that
Fatah's case against Task Force Saber 7 has fallen apart and four men
already ordered released by the Appeals Court.
|
Recent
Archived News
In The SuperPatriots' Case-

ANTI-TERRORIST FIGHTERS RELEASED
FOUR MEMBERS OF
TASK FORCE SABER/7 ORDERED FREED IN NEW TRIAL

December 9, 2004
Kabul, Afghanistan
Four of Jack's Team were declared innocent of all charges by the Afghan
Second Court, which granted a trial de novo (a new trial) and
three of Jack’s men were ordered to be released immediately by the
Appeals Court after hearing evidence from Afghan government police
officers and learning that the FBI was present during torture sessions
and seized evidence in the case for the second time.
Three American Prisoners Found Innocent of
First Charge Heard by Court
Three of Idema’s anti-terrorist team were Ordered released in the
controversial case of Jack Idema and six other men alleged to be hunting
terrorists, including Osama bin Laden.
As
the result of closed door hearing testimony, according to Afghan Appeals
Court judges, it is now undisputed that it was Idema’s men who were
tortured, not the original terrorist detainees arrested by Idema‘s
group. Furthermore, that FBI Agents are alleged to have authorized
and/or been present for the torture of Idema and his men in NDS custody.
Sometimes the FBI Agents were present in the room, sometimes in the next
room passing messages and questions during the interrogations and
torture.
On December 1, 2004, the Court of Appeals of the Islamic Transitional
Government of Afghanistan conducted a closed hearing in the case of the
three Americans and four Afghans who were convicted of running a private
prison, illegally arresting and torturing suspected terrorists, and
secretly entering Afghanistan with forged Indian passports to begin
their hunt for al-Qaida terrorists.
Evidence Surfaces That First Trial Conducted by Former Taliban Officials
In what had been a highly publicized trial in the first Court all seven
men, who claimed they were operating as Task Force Saber/7 with full
knowledge and support
of
the Afghan and US Governments, were given prison sentences of up to ten
years. The men’s repeated requests for Geneva Convention Prisoner of War
status have been ignored by the Afghan government, which alleged they
were not part of the coalition, but, in the words of Primary Court Judge
Abdul Baset Bakhtyari, “part of the resistance forces.” Bakhtyari had
announced to the international press his intention to find the men
guilty before the trial even began. It is now being alleged by the
defense, that Idema’s first Judge, Bakhtyari was a former Taliban Judge,
the prosecutor,
that
Mohammed Nahim Dawari was a former Taliban prosecutor, and that the
government appointed interpreter was in fact a former member of the
anti-American Soviet backed government. There is no dispute, even by
journalists present, that the interpreter consciously misinterpreted on
regular basis, provided advice to the Judge against the defense, and
often refused to interpret Idema’s and the defense attorney’s
statements.
The case is now in the Afghan Court of Appeals. On a motion by Idema and
the other defendants, the Appeals Court excluded the press corps from
the hearing based on Idema’s assertion that evidence presented would
affect the national security interests of both countries, and divulge
the identities of covert agents.
Idema Lawyer Wants FBI Prosecuted
After Seizing Evidence in Case for the Second Time
During the hearing, Idema, a Green Beret and former US Army Special
Forces soldier, who had been allowed to represent his four Afghan men
requested an inspection of the evidence room and the introduction of
videotape evidence seized in the raid of their Kabul compound. The Court
allowed Ed Caraballo, a four-time Emmy Award-winning investigative
journalist, and Brent Bennett, a former 82nd Airborne Tactical Air
Controller, to go to the evidence room to gather their audio, video, and
written evidence for use in the closed hearing. However, when Caraballo
and Bennett returned to the Court’s chambers, they informed the Chief
Judge that all of the video, audio, and photographic evidence was
missing.
The
Court summoned members of the NDS (Afghan Security Service) to chambers
and inquired about the evidence. It was then disclosed that agents of
the FBI had covertly removed all of the video, photographic, and audio
evidence, including the team’s computers which the men would need to
defend themselves, without notifying the Court. Tiffany says, “this was
the second time the FBI has interfered in their defense by taking and
destroying evidence in the case.”
Caraballo’s first lawyer, Michael Skibbie, originally accused the FBI of
taking evidence during the initial series of hearings in August. The
defense’s claims were later proven true when the FBI, under orders of
the Afghan Ministry of Justice, returned hundreds of documents and
videotapes in the middle of an August trial. Still much of the evidence
was still missing.
The
Appeal Court’s latest inquiry disclosed that the FBI had again taken the
evidence just six days prior to the December 1st hearing. Tiffany said
that, “without the evidence the defendants would be unable to mount any
defense whatsoever.” Defense lawyers said that this is an intentional
interference with justice and the destruction of exculpatory evidence by
the FBI which has no jurisdiction in the case.
FBI Agents Should Be Arrested and Prosecuted
Attorney John Tiffany is demanding that “any FBI agents involved in the
taking of evidence in the Idema Case be arrested, brought up on criminal
charges, and prosecuted for unlawful interference with an ongoing
judicial process over which they have absolutely no legal authority
or jurisdiction.”
According to Tiffany, just moments before the hearing continued, a
sealed Federal Express package was delivered containing confidential
documents and videotapes sent by John Tiffany to Afghanistan. Using the
evidence enclosed Idema represented each of the defendants and began
their defense. It was the first time ever the Court allowed the defense
to call witnesses.
Four of Idema’s Anti-Terrorist Team Declared Innocent by Court of
Appeals
During the hearing, Sherzai Ahmadi, one of Idema’s men, testified that
he was beaten and drugged by NDS agents and “foreigners” at which time
he woke up with purple ink on his thumb, indicating he had signed a
statement. Ahmadi told the Court that he thought it was a dream. Ahmadi
says he was given three blue tablets, believed to be Valium, for his
torture injuries, then rendered incapable of resisting his fingerprint
on a false statement.
Major
Ezmerai, Idema’s close protection officer, testified that he was
electrocuted, and showed the court the electrical burns on his palms,
which were still present five months later. Even after repeated
electrocution, Major Ezmerai, a Ministry of Defence employee and 15 year
veteran of the Panshir Army and Northern Alliance, refused to sign any
statement against his American co-defendants. Idema claims that the
torture of his men occurred in the presence of American FBI agents and
with the knowledge of the “highest levels of the FBI in Washington.”
Afghan Police Officer Testifies
Idema Treated Detainees Well
The court was shown videotape evidence of secret US Military meetings
with the group, meetings with US intelligence officers, Ministry of
Defence officials, and even Marshall Mohammed Fahim, the Minister of
Defence. But even more compelling, according to Court Officials was the
testimony of a government police official that was present at the arrest
of admitted terrorist Ghulamsaki (whose brother Mohammed Asef is in
GITMO Detention, Cuba).
Karzai’s Bodyguard Present
During Terrorist Arrest by Idema’s Team
The
police official, who’s identify has not been disclosed, testified that
he witnessed members of President Karzai’s Protective Detail present at
the arrest and coordinating with the Presidential Palace. He also
testified that Idema’s treatment of suspected persons, women, children,
and prisoners was exemplary and in full conformance with Islamic law.
This was corroborated by video showing female Afghan National Police
Detectives present during Idema’s searches and raids.
The result of the four hour closed hearing? A new trial de novo
was granted, as was a bifurcated trial allowing the charges against the
Afghans to be heard first, and then the issue of the Americans illegally
entering the country on forged Indian passports. By the end of the
hearing, the Afghan Court of Appeals had declared all four Afghans
innocent of all charges.
Three of Idema’s Team Released From Afghan Prison on Court’s Order
Members of Idema’s team, including Major Ezmerai Amin, a commissioned
officer in the Afghan Ministry of Defence were ordered released, as was
Sohail Shohabi, a translator, and Sherzai Ahmadi, a house worker.
Lieutenant
Wahid Rasuli, who the group refers to as “Zorro,” and is also a Ministry
of Defence employee, refused to be released without Idema and the rest
of the team, requesting the judges allow him to stay in prison with the
Jack Idema and the two other Americans until the trials were completed.
Rasuli told the judges, “in this group there is only one thing I have
learned above all else, leave no man behind. I request to stay.” The
judges granted his request. The Release Order frees the other three men
with time served, which was apparently drafted with the idea of
preventing future litigation for false imprisonment.
Attorney John Tiffany, who represented Jack Idema, the team’s leader,
said, “the first trial was a sham. No prosecution witness gave testimony
under oath, no cross-examination or questions of any kind were allowed,
no defense witnesses were allowed, there was no discovery, and poor
often completely erroneous, sometimes non-existent translation of the
trial. The three Americans barely knew what was happening, and neither
did their lawyers.”
Caraballo Lawyer Threatened
With Arrest in First Court
In
the final trial Bob Fogelnest represented Ed Caraballo, who was filming
a documentary about the War on Terror when Caraballo was arrested with
the other men on July 5th, 2004. Fogelnest attempted to read their joint
defense statement in the initial phase of the Primary Court trial and
was promptly threatened with arrest by Judge Bakhtyari if he continued
to read it. Only the first paragraph of the 21 page defense statement
was entered into evidence.
Fogelnest, a well-known international defense lawyer that practices
before the Hague in War Crimes trials, has repeatedly stated that that
the first hearings and trials were the worst example of international
justice he has ever seen or heard of.
According to Fogelnest, “the prosecution presented not one shred of
evidence against any of the men, using news articles from Associated
Press and other hearsay statements to make their case. It is not only
unheard of, but in violation of both Afghan and international law.”
Tiffany added, “the only person allowed to testify in the first trial
was Idema, who basically created such a disturbance after I argued with
Chief Judge Bakhtyari, that they had to let him make a statement. Unlike
the prosecution witnesses, Idema also demanded to testify under oath on
the Koran, which resulted in cheers from the courtroom.”
First Charge Dismissed Against the Three American Prisoners
Reviewing videotape of the three Americans entering Kabul and being
greeted by a contingent of high-ranking Afghan authorities, including
the Commander of the Border Police, the Airport Manager, and even one of
President Karzai’s brothers, the Court saw three US passports being
handed to Afghan government officials, customs forms being filled out,
and National Police officers carrying the American’s bags through
customs.
The Court of Appeals ruled that the entry into Afghanistan had been
legal and the charge was dismissed. The Court agreed to hear the other
charges in a separate hearing scheduled for a future date.
Attorney
John Tiffany says that the FBI has been running roughshod over the
Afghan judicial process at the expense of his client’s liberty and due
process interests in an attempt to avoid the Bureau’s own shortcomings
in the war against terror.
Tiffany applauded the action of the Appellate Court saying, “I commend
them for having the courage to do the right thing and look at the
evidence, not baseless unsupported allegations.” High-Ranking
Afghan Judicial and Military officials have privately called the men
heroes for their actions in Afghanistan.
While much still remains unclear in this convoluted case, one thing
continues to punctuate it– what the defense has maintained from the
outset consistently proves to be true at each turn of the proceedings.

-For Further Information, Contact
Attorney John Tiffany 973/566-9300.
-For Photos, Contact Kelly Price at
Polaris Images 212/967-5656.
|